Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research Presents:
KNOWLEDGE BASE    LOG IN  
DCConsult:  Better Health Through Research
Click here to report a problem with this pageClick here to find a solution to your problem in our knowledge base
 Welcome to DCConsult
What is DCConsult?
DCConsultSM was designed to meet the needs of the chiropractic profession. It provides doctors with timely and accurate information that will minimize risk and foster the best possible patient care. The content includes reviews of the scientific literature related to the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of common clinical conditions. Other content includes patient handouts, articles from experts in the field, pre-defined Manual, Alternative and Natural Therapy Index SystemTM (MANTIS) searches, critical product reviews, and coding and billing information.

Special sections will be available to address the needs of students, faculty, as well as national and international organizations. Please join us and encourage your colleagues to join the Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research (FCER) in our efforts to better serve your needs and that of your patients.

By registering at this site and/or logging into our service, you are agreeing to our Terms of Service. It is also recommended that you are familiar with our Privacy Policy.

Announcements
DCConsult Editorial Staff - 9/17/2008
New evidence-based prevention, diagnosis, and treatment overviews of Lumbar Facet Pain (LFP) have been added to the list of clinical conditions available on DCConsult. Among the conservative treatments and level of evidence discussed are spinal manipulation/adjustment, non-surgical spinal decompression, and others (including exercise, electrotherapy, low level laser therapy, ultrasound, and shortwave diathermy); the medical treatments of radiofrequency denervation and lumbar facet joint injection are also discussed by evidence.
NEW Evidence-Based Review Available on High Ankle Sprain
DCConsult Editorial Staff - 9/4/2008
NEW Evidence-Based Review Available on Lateral Ankle Sprain
DCConsult Editorial Staff - 7/15/2008
NEW Evidence-Based Review Available on Otitis Media
DC Consult Editorial Staff - 4/23/2008
NEW Evidence-Based Review Available on Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
DC Consult Editorial Staff - 4/1/2008
Latest Research on Stroke and Manipulation
DC Consult Editorial Staff - 3/14/2008
Recently Published Articles
Parker College of Chiropractic Research Institute - 8/11/2008
The difficulties of arriving at an accurate diagnosis for lumbar facet mediated pain (LFMP) were previously described in the diagnosis section of this monograph. These difficulties lead to critical shortcomings in the process of determining the best course of treatment available. Very few studies, if any, relating to conservative care have provided the method used to arrive at an accurate diagnosis. An example of this weakness is found in a 2003 study on the diagnostic profiles of 1018 patients. Although lesions of the vertebral facet constituted 47% of the diagnoses, diagnostic procedures were not reported in this study. One must be sure an accurate diagnosis was made when one is evaluating the efficacy of a therapy. Consequently, all studies on conservative treatments were given C ratings due to this shortcoming.

Parker College of Chiropractic Research Institute - 7/31/2008
Several different authors estimate that 15 to 45% of all chronic low back pain is lumbar facet mediated pain (LFMP). The “gold standard” for diagnosis, which is recognized by most experts, is a series of two facet blocks using anesthetics which are active for different periods of time. An initial block is given and if the patient receives a significant reduction of pain a second block is performed. If the second provides a longer period of relief then it is assumed the pain arises from the facet. It must be mentioned when Schulte et al reported on the outcomes of 21 studies of LFMP using injection therapy, radiofrequency therapy or cryorhizotomy only 50% of patients achieved successful outcomes. If the pain generator in these cases were the facet joints, why were the results not more impressive? It is possible that the gold standard may be better described as the “best standard available” but not quite golden.

Parker College of Chiropractic Research Institute - 7/16/2008
Although the lumbar facet is well established as a pain generator, very little meaningful research has been performed to determine risk factors. To evaluate risk factors for lumbar facet mediated pain (LFMP), one needs to locate a population with this specific diagnosis. However this has proven difficult. Clinical diagnosis is very uncertain. The gold standard of diagnosis is a series of two facet blocks which limits study populations. As a result many of the studies available are observational, performed on animals or cadavers or are speculative in nature.

Parker College of Chiropractic Research Institute - 6/16/2008
Treatment of the high ankle sprain (HAS) is based wholly on observational studies and expert opinion. No RCT's or cohort studies have been performed to determine efficacy. In reading treatment studies it appears the protocols for lateral ankle sprain (LAS) have been adopted for the treatment of HAS. Included in this monograph are sections taken from the LAS review as the information may prove beneficial to the treating physician. The primary difference in the protocols is the phases of treatment tend to last longer in the HAS as the injury tends to have a longer recovery time. Hopkinson et al found a LAS requires on average 28 days to heal while the HAS requires 55 days. Confirming this finding was another study which reported the average missed time for National Hockey League players with HAS was 38 days while it was only 1.4 days with lateral ankle sprain.

Parker College of Chiropractic Research Institute - 5/25/2008
The high ankle sprain (HAS) is also known as an ankle syndesmosis injury. Some authors consider it a relatively rare occurrence, representing only 1% or less of all ankle sprains. Others consider it a much more common injury, especially in athletes. No studies were located that discuss prevention strategies or risk factors. However the mechanism of injury may provide some insight into risk factors.

Parker College of Chiropractic Research Institute - 5/21/2008
The lack of quality studies relating to the diagnosis of ankle sprains may be attributable to the fact that all ankle sprains are treated in a similar manner regardless of grade. They are separated primarily by the length of time spent in the different phases of recovery. Interestingly ankle sprains are also treated similarly in all of the healing arts with only minor differences. Even the value of surgical intervention for Grade 3 sprains rather than conservative treatment is controversial.

Parker College of Chiropractic Research Institute - 5/10/2008
The paucity of material on high ankle sprains (HAS) is reflected in the lack significant data relating to diagnostic testing. Only a handful of clinical tests were located that are used in HAS and none of the studies provide sensitivity or specificity information. The primary concern to the physician is to rule out fracture, which is relatively common and frank diastasis of the syndesmosis.

Parker College of Chiropractic Research Institute - 5/7/2008
Ankle injuries are responsible for 15% of all sports injuries and are commonly encountered in practice. The diagnostic difficulties surrounding grading of the injury and ruling out fracture are the greatest challenges to the physician. Many of the articles located are "how to" articles and the author's comments appear very strong in support of certain diagnostic procedures. However there is very little in the literature that demonstrates sensitivity and specificity of standard diagnostic procedures, particularly related to partial ligament tears and ruptures.

Parker College of Chiropractic Research Institute - 4/29/2008
Although lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is considered one, if not the most, common sports injury, a very conflicting body of evidence exists as to risk factors. Recurring themes of many studies are statements such as “our findings disagree with previous studies”. It seemed in preparation of this review unless a risk factor had been only reported in one study; there was a different assessment in another.

Dr. Charles R. Herring - 4/24/2008
Over the years, scientific evidence has been published that may improve the physician's ability to differentially diagnose various spinal pathologies but clinical diagnosis of mechanical back pain has not seen many new developments. Clinicians continue to rely on orthopedic tests and palpation skills as the primary tools to determine the origin of the pain. Based on the results of these tests, the clinician then decides if additional testing is needed and/or selects the treatments that are most appropriate for the patient's condition.

Quick Login
User Name:  
Password:  

  Remember Me


Forgot Password?






Recent Reviews [Conditions]
  Lumbar Facet Pain: Evidence-Based Therapy
  [ Published on 8/11/2008 ]
  Lumbar Facet Pain: Evidence-Based Diagnosis
  [ Published on 7/31/2008 ]
  Lumbar Facet Pain: Evidence-Based Prevention
  [ Published on 7/16/2008 ]
  High Ankle Sprain: Evidence-Based Treatment
  [ Published on 6/16/2008 ]
  High Ankle Sprain: Evidence-Based Prevention
  [ Published on 5/25/2008 ]
  Lateral Ankle Sprain: Evidence-Based Treatment
  [ Published on 5/21/2008 ]
  High Ankle Sprain: Evidence-Based Diagnosis
  [ Published on 5/10/2008 ]
  Lateral Ankle Sprain: Evidence-Based Diagnosis
  [ Published on 5/7/2008 ]
  Lateral Ankle Sprain: Evidence-Based Prevention
  [ Published on 4/29/2008 ]
  Otitis Media: Evidence-Based Therapy
  [ Published on 4/18/2008 ]

Recent Reviews [Procedures]
  Cryotherapy: A Review of the Literature
  [ Published on 2/4/2008 ]


Browse our Archive of Frequently Asked Question

Created by FCER:  Go to the FCER website now (opens a new browser window)
© 1991 - 2008 Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research, Norwalk, Iowa (FCER) and Action Potential, Inc.

DCConsultSM and the Manual, Alternative and Natural Therapy Index System (MANTISTM) Database are trademarks or registered trademarks of FCER and Action Potential, Inc. in the U.S. and/or other countries.

All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.